Armenian Officials Respond to Aliyev’s Statement About Lake Sevan
Photo: Pixabay, illustrative purposes
On November 3, Armenian officials commented on recent remarks by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Orda.kz reports, citing NewsArmenia.AM.
Aliyev claimed that “there is no Lake Sevan, there is Geicha,” and referred to early 20th-century imperial Russian maps showing Azerbaijani toponyms on what is now Armenian territory
Armenian Parliament Speaker Alen Simonyan dismissed the statement as politically motivated and intended for a domestic audience.
If we delve into historical research, it may turn out that someone will find their homeland in the Altai. This is aimed at an internal audience. I don’t want to respond or comment on it,
Simonyan said, when asked whether Aliyev’s words contradicted Armenia’s peace agenda.
He added that the Azerbaijani president “is not talking about liberation but about coming to Armenia in cars, not tanks.”
“I see that he says this issue will not be resolved by war,” Simonyan noted.
Defense Minister Suren Papikyan also addressed Aliyev’s comments, saying that Azerbaijan’s rhetoric has eased since August 8, a change he said was visible along the border.
Frankly speaking, I am not in the habit of commenting on things I haven’t heard or read. I will read it myself and, if necessary, respond next time,
Papikyan told reporters.
“And when we talk about real peace, it’s not imagined — it’s a reality,” he added.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has cautioned against basing political arguments on historical place names:
Is it worth pointing out that the statement by the President of Azerbaijan does not reflect the whole picture? Because the President of Azerbaijan did not say that the name of Lake Sevan is Geicha, but that on tsarist maps there is no Lake Sevan, only some other name. An awkward situation…
Pashinyan said.
Meanwhile, Deputy Speaker Ruben Rubinyan also responded on Facebook:
If we go far enough back, at some point we won’t see the name Sevan on old maps. Instead, we’ll see the Gegam or Gegarkunik Sea. And we won’t see Azerbaijan,
wrote Rubinyan.
Rubinyan added that there is no point in looking back.
“We must move forward. That is the essence of the August 8 Declaration,” he said.
Latest news
- Chaos and Delays at the Border: Kazakhstan Wants to Bring Queues Under Control With New Rules
- Major Illegal Migration Channel Dismantled in Shymkent
- “A Shameful Sight”: Dump Near Altyn-Emel Caught on Video
- Kazakhstan Is Preparing to Increase the Scrap Fee on Cars From Russia
- Work Permits For Migrants To Go Fully Online As PSCs End Service
- Kazakhstanis Expect Higher Inflation but Remain Optimistic About the Future
- Support For Rural Doctors Doubles Amid Staffing Shortage
- South Korean Shareholder To Inject 4.7 Billion Tenge Into Kazakhstan’s Only Loss-Making Bank
- Tokayev Finishes Uzbekistan Trip With Focus on Trade and Environmental Cooperation
- Kashagan Operator Accused Of Stalling Sulfur Fine Pending Washington Arbitration
- Copper And Molybdenum Project Set To Launch In Abay Region
- Deputies Raise Alarm Over Chaos in Construction Licensing and Oversight
- Kazakhstan’s Tobacco Output Surges as Smoking Rate Holds Steady
- EAEU Waives Import Duties on Several Vegetables for Kazakhstan
- SpaceX Direct-to-Cell Service Still Awaiting Commercial Launch in Kazakhstan
- Kazakhstan To Require Near Real-Time Emissions Reporting From Enterprises
- Tokayev Says Elections to Kazakhstan’s New Parliament Will Be Held in August
- System Outage Leaves Foreigners Without IIN and Residence Permit Services in Kazakhstan
- Sowing 2026: What Kazakhstan Will Plant and How It Will Pay for It
- What Higher Foreign Labor Hiring Rates Could Mean for Kazakhstan