Court Rules Against Former Senator in Image Use Dispute
Photo: Senate.parlam.kz
Director of the Institute of Parliamentarism and former senator Kanatbek Safinov has lost a legal case against a capital-based media outlet over the use of his image, Orda.kz reports.
The Astana court reviewed the case following Safinov’s claim that journalists unlawfully used his photo in a July 2024 publication. The article in question concerned a mansion owned by his brother, oligarch Murat Safin.
The plaintiff's image is posted online against the backdrop of a graphic collage of stacks of dollar bills and a large mansion. Similar material is published on the defendant's Instagram account. The claims are motivated by the plaintiff's lack of consent to use his own image, which, in his opinion, caused moral damage,
the court stated.
Safinov argued that the publication led to financial losses, including the termination of a profitable contract by his business partners.
The court of first instance sided with the media outlet. Safinov filed an appeal, but the appellate court upheld the original decision. Judges noted that the image had been sourced from open platforms and showed the former senator during a public event while he was serving in office.
According to the court, image use without consent is prohibited except under specific legal circumstances, such as when it involves a public figure and the image was previously made publicly available.
The Constitutional Court has clarified that the right to one’s image is not absolute and can be limited when justified by public interest. The Ministry of Information also confirmed that no rights were violated in this instance.
The court concluded that there were no violations of the legislation on online platforms and online advertising. The defendant, acting as a media outlet, did not require the plaintiff's consent to prepare, publish, reproduce and distribute information related to the plaintiff's public activities. Since no violations of the plaintiff's personal non-property benefits and rights were established, the court also refused to recover damages and moral harm.
The decision has entered into legal force.
Original Author: Zhadra Zhulmukhametova
Latest news
- Kazakhstan’s IT Market Slows After Years of Rapid Growth, but Salaries Keep Rising
- Why the Oil Price Spike Did Not Help Kazakhstan’s Budget Much, the Ministry Explained
- Why More Women in Kazakhstan Are Working Beyond the 40-Hour Week
- Drone Strikes on CPC Drag Down Kazakhstan’s Oil and Gas Output
- New Parking Rules Approved in Astana: How Much Will Drivers Pay and Who Is Exempt?
- Shell and Eni Replaced in Karachaganak Gas Plant Project
- Economist Calculates How Much Income Kazakhstanis Actually Keep
- Samruk-Kazyna Raises 3 Billion Yuan on AIX in Record-Low Panda Bond Deal
- Kazakhstan to Build Four New Airports by 2028
- State-Owned Plant in Atyrau Tried to Buy Sturgeon Caviar for Nearly 150 Million Tenge
- Chaos and Delays at the Border: Kazakhstan Wants to Bring Queues Under Control With New Rules
- Major Illegal Migration Channel Dismantled in Shymkent
- “A Shameful Sight”: Dump Near Altyn-Emel Caught on Video
- Kazakhstan Is Preparing to Increase the Scrap Fee on Cars From Russia
- Work Permits For Migrants To Go Fully Online As PSCs End Service
- Kazakhstanis Expect Higher Inflation but Remain Optimistic About the Future
- Support For Rural Doctors Doubles Amid Staffing Shortage
- South Korean Shareholder To Inject 4.7 Billion Tenge Into Kazakhstan’s Only Loss-Making Bank
- Tokayev Finishes Uzbekistan Trip With Focus on Trade and Environmental Cooperation
- Kashagan Operator Accused Of Stalling Sulfur Fine Pending Washington Arbitration
