Court Rules Against Former Senator in Image Use Dispute
Photo: Senate.parlam.kz
Director of the Institute of Parliamentarism and former senator Kanatbek Safinov has lost a legal case against a capital-based media outlet over the use of his image, Orda.kz reports.
The Astana court reviewed the case following Safinov’s claim that journalists unlawfully used his photo in a July 2024 publication. The article in question concerned a mansion owned by his brother, oligarch Murat Safin.
The plaintiff's image is posted online against the backdrop of a graphic collage of stacks of dollar bills and a large mansion. Similar material is published on the defendant's Instagram account. The claims are motivated by the plaintiff's lack of consent to use his own image, which, in his opinion, caused moral damage,
the court stated.
Safinov argued that the publication led to financial losses, including the termination of a profitable contract by his business partners.
The court of first instance sided with the media outlet. Safinov filed an appeal, but the appellate court upheld the original decision. Judges noted that the image had been sourced from open platforms and showed the former senator during a public event while he was serving in office.
According to the court, image use without consent is prohibited except under specific legal circumstances, such as when it involves a public figure and the image was previously made publicly available.
The Constitutional Court has clarified that the right to one’s image is not absolute and can be limited when justified by public interest. The Ministry of Information also confirmed that no rights were violated in this instance.
The court concluded that there were no violations of the legislation on online platforms and online advertising. The defendant, acting as a media outlet, did not require the plaintiff's consent to prepare, publish, reproduce and distribute information related to the plaintiff's public activities. Since no violations of the plaintiff's personal non-property benefits and rights were established, the court also refused to recover damages and moral harm.
The decision has entered into legal force.
Original Author: Zhadra Zhulmukhametova
Latest news
- Astana to Reward Residents for Reporting Offenses
- Kazakhstan Officially Licenses Crypto Exchange Operator for the First Time
- More Than 200,000 People in Kazakhstan Legally Own Weapons
- Kazakhstan Builds Greenhouses To End Winter Vegetable Shortages
- Kazakhstan’s State Oil Company And China’s CNPC Plan Refinery Expansion
- Kazakhstan And Turkey Sign Nuclear Energy Cooperation Deal
- Kazakhstan Sets Campaign Dates For Kurultai Election
- Kazakhstan Tightens Control Over Fuel Prices
- Almaty Metro Bans Electric Scooters, Bikes And Skateboards
- Kazakhstan Ready To Supply Gasoline To Russia On Mutually Beneficial Terms
- Banks in Kazakhstan and Other EAEU Countries Tighten Rules on Cash Ruble Deposits
- Kazakh Billionaire Sues Guinea Over Bauxite Mining License
- Kazakhstan May Become Founding Member of New International AI Organization
- New Astana Airport Construction To Begin Next Year
- Kazakhstan’s New Parliament Enters Election Mode
- Kazakhstani Schools To Make Constitution Classes Mandatory
- Astana Fines 21 Women For Wearing Niqabs In Public
- U.S. Investment In Kazakhstan Could Rise To $137 Billion
- Kazakhstan To Create Digital Family Profiles With Income And Expense Data
- Snow Leopard Cubs Caught On Camera Trap In Katon-Karagai
