Armenian Officials Respond to Aliyev’s Statement About Lake Sevan
Photo: Pixabay, illustrative purposes
On November 3, Armenian officials commented on recent remarks by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Orda.kz reports, citing NewsArmenia.AM.
Aliyev claimed that “there is no Lake Sevan, there is Geicha,” and referred to early 20th-century imperial Russian maps showing Azerbaijani toponyms on what is now Armenian territory
Armenian Parliament Speaker Alen Simonyan dismissed the statement as politically motivated and intended for a domestic audience.
If we delve into historical research, it may turn out that someone will find their homeland in the Altai. This is aimed at an internal audience. I don’t want to respond or comment on it,
Simonyan said, when asked whether Aliyev’s words contradicted Armenia’s peace agenda.
He added that the Azerbaijani president “is not talking about liberation but about coming to Armenia in cars, not tanks.”
“I see that he says this issue will not be resolved by war,” Simonyan noted.
Defense Minister Suren Papikyan also addressed Aliyev’s comments, saying that Azerbaijan’s rhetoric has eased since August 8, a change he said was visible along the border.
Frankly speaking, I am not in the habit of commenting on things I haven’t heard or read. I will read it myself and, if necessary, respond next time,
Papikyan told reporters.
“And when we talk about real peace, it’s not imagined — it’s a reality,” he added.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has cautioned against basing political arguments on historical place names:
Is it worth pointing out that the statement by the President of Azerbaijan does not reflect the whole picture? Because the President of Azerbaijan did not say that the name of Lake Sevan is Geicha, but that on tsarist maps there is no Lake Sevan, only some other name. An awkward situation…
Pashinyan said.
Meanwhile, Deputy Speaker Ruben Rubinyan also responded on Facebook:
If we go far enough back, at some point we won’t see the name Sevan on old maps. Instead, we’ll see the Gegam or Gegarkunik Sea. And we won’t see Azerbaijan,
wrote Rubinyan.
Rubinyan added that there is no point in looking back.
“We must move forward. That is the essence of the August 8 Declaration,” he said.
Latest news
- Kazakhstan Maintains Neutral Stance on Middle East Escalation
- Kazakh MFA: Citizens Evacuated from the Middle East via Oman and Saudi Arabia
- Kazakhstan to Spend 4.6 Trillion Tenge on Road Projects Through 2029
- Central Asia Competes for the Skies: Why Kazakhstan Risks Falling Behind Uzbekistan on Jet Fuel
- The War in Iran Opens a Window of Opportunity for Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector, Analysts Say
- Iran Conflict Escalates Beyond the Gulf: What Kazakh Experts Say About Risks for Central Asia and Kazakhstan
- Kazakhstan Prepares Possible Evacuation of Its Citizens From Iran
- LRT in Astana Is Reaching the Finish Line: The Launch Is Expected in the Coming Months
- Kazakhstan Ready to Help the UAE Amid Escalation in the Region
- Tokayev Discusses Middle East Escalation With Qatar’s Emir
- Airlines Ready to Bring Kazakhstanis Home From the Middle East
- Tokayev Sends Support Messages to Gulf Leaders Amid Regional Escalation
- Kazakhstan Bans Its Airlines From Flying Over Several Middle East Countries
- Astana Strengthens Security Measures Amid Escalation Around Iran
- Tokayev Meets U.S. Ambassador Stufft, Discusses Board of Peace Cooperation
- Mangystau Launches AI-Assisted School Monitoring to Prevent Teen Suicidal Behavior
- Kazakhstan to Supply UK With Critical Minerals
- AI Faculties for Educators to Open in Kazakhstan: What Other Changes Are Coming to the Education Sector
- There Are Medals — But Not Enough Ice: What’s Happening to Figure Skating in Kazakhstan
- Is Kazakhstan’s Nuclear Power Plant Project at Risk After New UK Sanctions? Rosatom Responds